Wednesday, 18 April 2012

Candidate Details


Candidate Name:
Oluwadara Kolajo

Candidate Number:
5137

Centre Name:
Wilmington Grammar School for Girls

Centre Number:
61119

Monday, 16 April 2012

Final Products

 Ancillary Task 1 - Theatrical Poster

 

Ancillary Task 2 - Magazine Cover

       
Main Task- Trailer



Friday, 13 April 2012

Evaluation Question 4 (Ancillary Tasks and Main Task)

How did you use new media technologies in the construction and research, planning and evaluation stages?

VOICE NOTE BELOW




Evidence of using some media technologies:

Below Print screens from website where I converted my word document to a mp3




Print Screen from VOKI (a site that allowed me to make a speaking avatar)



Pritscreen from Glogster where I created my own poster:


Printscreen of using Mix Pad where we created our sound track:




Thursday, 12 April 2012

Evaluation Question 3 (Ancillary Tasks and Main Task)

What have you learnt from your audience feedback?
Audience feedback was extremely important in the process of my A2 coursework. In order to appeal to the set target audience, during the construction stage regularly we peer assessed coursework as a class, not only for the main task and ancillary tasks themselves but also our blogs which had a part to play for our overall marks. Through this exercise my group actually under covered some issues with lighting which we could easily address, but at the same time we knew we were heading in the right direction in terms of the genre and mise en scene which was very encouraging. Alongside showing the finished ancillary task products to the class, I put our finished products as my display picture on Blackberry Messenger allowing my contacts to comment so I could get a wider set of opinions. The plus side of this is that feedback was that it was coming from my  target audience. I learnt from AS the questionnaires are not so popular, with the increase in young people using social networking sites I used this to my advantage to get feed back efficiently


The feedback was positive, meaning there was no need to make anymore changes to my product. However if there was some constructive criticism, we would of have the time to apply this to my our work. Many of the people that I talked to about the products said that they looked like real life forms of media, Immediately they knew what we were trying to portray. We had similar feedback from our final cut of our trailer, my partner I decided to post it on  Facebook, Twitter and You Tube, within the first day of posting received more than 50 views suggesting that our trailer was something that interested the public. From the starting point of making our trailer we always knew that the name was important.









Not only did constructive criticism help with the making of the products but the positive feed helped me and my partner through the process as we then knew we were going in the right direction.